Gina wrote:

This is what the “doctor” did ...

“There were wounds in Kristen’s chest that didn’t have corresponding defects in the clothes,” Murtagh says. He talks in lawyer speak. What he means is: Kristy was probably killed as she slept, by someone who first lifted her pajama top, as if to better identify the location of vital organs. She is knifed front and back, with anatomical precision, along the heart, the aortic arch and the pulmonary vein.”By Gene Weingarten December 5, 2012

 
Exactly, well said.

red1975pacer wrote:

The only fact that matters is that JMac has done 40 years and is up for parole.   Anything else is irrelevant

 
He’s been up for parole and cancelled. Why? Because he won’t allocate and show remorse. And, it’s not innocence, it’s because he’s a narcissist. Classic behavior. His crimes and his behavior will be relevant until he passes. Tried, convicted, and sentenced. The only thing irrelevant is his supporters, because it’s over.

Red, forty years is about right, for each murder.

red1975pacer wrote:

He has not been rejected or denied parole in the last year or so.   With covid and JMac vulnerability to illness it’s not totally irrelevant.   Let’s not jump to conclusions and say “parole denied “

 
What are you smoking?  I never said anything about parole being denied. I said he.canceled his hearing, which he did. He has not been denied in the “last year is so” because there has not been a hearing.

You seem um, disoriented. Are you okay?

Last edited by TexasPoet (4/14/2022 8:55 am)

red1975pacer wrote:

Just admit you hate JMac and then we’re in a position to move forward.  Your claiming he canceled the parole hearing because he “lacks remorse “. JMac has mo credibility then half y’all.  Whatcha smokin?

 
I don’t hate, it’s unhealthy. I see MacDonald as evil and he is where he needs to be. I also pity him. Such intelligence and talent that was wasted. I did not claim he cancelled the parole hearing because he lacks remorse. I don’t know why he cancelled it. I did state that to get a parole he would have allocute and show remorse, and I don’t believe he can do that.

I have no interest in moving forward with you. You and your schtick are old and tiring and to no purpose. I’m done with you, move along.

red1975pacer wrote:

That’s fine.   One sheep 🐑 opinion does not make or break this discussion Forum.    People enjoy the input, however controversial, that Red brings to this Forum.      Check view number when He’s debating a topic

 
LOL! You don’t debate anything. You never present opposing facts, evidence or arguments, which is what a debate consists of. You’re not controversial, you play the fool. You bring nothing, except irrelevant blather, to the forum. You obviously suffer from delusions of grandeur, among other things. That is your schtick. You must be a sad, lonely . . . . .man?

It’s funny you chose pacer as a screen name, the Pacer was the ridiculous,
looking, poorly performing, “unusual styled car often credited to ruining American Motor Corporation“. And  the 1975 Pacer didn’t even offer the gas-guzzling 4.2 litre High Output engine yet. Interesting.

Last edited by TexasPoet (4/15/2022 12:48 pm)