The Jeffrey MacDonald Discussion Board

You are not logged in. Would you like to login?



4/12/2022 1:19 pm  #41


Re: Michael Franzese jail with Mac

Nobody is playing the fool.     It’s known that Red is not as much convinced of JMac’s guilt.    He’s an easy target.     Over the years there has been JMac supporters on this Forum but one by one they were eliminated

Last edited by red1975pacer (4/12/2022 1:25 pm)

 

4/12/2022 1:57 pm  #42


Re: Michael Franzese jail with Mac

red1975pacer wrote:

Nobody is playing the fool.     It’s known that Red is not as much convinced of JMac’s guilt.    He’s an easy target.     Over the years there has been JMac supporters on this Forum but one by one they were eliminated

 
1. Mac is NOT an easy target, he’s the only target, a brutal narcissistic family annihilator, proven by facts and evidence. Fairly tried and convicted.

2. I’m not aware of anyone being “eliminated”. Many left because they could not counter the powerful facts and evidence or change minds. Their choice.

JMac? Sounds like a bromance. Do you ever worry that supporting such evil might damage your soul?

By the way, did you know that illeism, referring to yourself in the third person, is a sign of mental instability?

Last edited by TexasPoet (4/12/2022 2:03 pm)

 

4/12/2022 2:26 pm  #43


Re: Michael Franzese jail with Mac

Red senses a certain hostile environment becoming more apparent in these “Red Slander Attempts”. Just because someone looks at all the evidence with an open mind doesn’t make them evil or mentally ill.   Good luck with your Forum.   How long have you been on this Forum , Texas poet?

Last edited by red1975pacer (4/12/2022 2:59 pm)

     Thread Starter
 

4/12/2022 4:31 pm  #44


Re: Michael Franzese jail with Mac

I have been here many years and I’ve never slandered anyone. An open mind would imply you have looked at ALL of the facts and evidence, from all angles, without prejudice. Your comments do not show an open mind. In fact, you usually dodge discussing facts and evidence.

I have read Fatal Vision, and Wilderness of Error. I couldn’t finish Fatal Justice, it was so badly written and researched. I have read most of the case file. I base my opinion of the case on the voluminous evidence.

Answer one question; why would a loving concerned father and husband not cry out for help, and then treat his family in the dark?

Last edited by TexasPoet (4/12/2022 4:32 pm)

 

4/12/2022 4:39 pm  #45


Re: Michael Franzese jail with Mac

red1975pacer wrote:

Nobody is playing the fool. It’s known that Red is not as much convinced of JMac’s guilt. He’s an easy target. Over the years there has been JMac supporters on this Forum but one by one they were eliminated

Many of the "Mac Supporters" on this forum eliminated their own selves! Several communicated with me that 

after reviewing all of the evidence, they could come to no other conclusion but that Inmate is GUILTY.

I have never banned anyone for being a Mac supporter,


 

 

4/12/2022 6:01 pm  #46


Re: Michael Franzese jail with Mac

As a medical doctor JMac has the persona to not cry out for help.  He would handle the situation as well as he could under the circumstances.    Not being emotional in time of distress is what the man was trained for.  Who knows if the lights were on or off.   The statement he gave originally should never have been in concrete.    The man , guilty or innocent, was under stress

Last edited by red1975pacer (4/12/2022 6:17 pm)

     Thread Starter
 

4/12/2022 6:25 pm  #47


Re: Michael Franzese jail with Mac

red1975pacer wrote:

As a medical doctor JMac has the persona to not cry out for help.  He would handle the situation as well as he could under the circumstances.    Not being emotional in time of distress is what the man was trained for

 
Oh come on! He was a father and husband who claims his family was crying out for help. Why didn’t he scream profanities and threats in anger, or as a distraction as he fought back? Simple. He WAS the attacker brutally killing his pregnant wife Colette, and the baby, and Kimberly and Kristin.

He was a trained physician, and a trained triage physician. If he wasn’t the attacker he never would have pulled the knife from Colette’s chest causing hemorrhaging, and he would never perform CPR on a bed, only on a hard service, otherwise it’s useless. And, as a trained physician he would have turned on every light in the house. All the lights were out when the MPs arrived. Only the killer benefitted from the darkness and silence. Ask any Doctor you know if they would treat someone in the dark, if there were working lights available. You know the answer.

Bromance? Like I asked before, don’t you worry about damaging your soul? Or is playing games that important to you?

Last edited by TexasPoet (4/12/2022 6:28 pm)

 

4/13/2022 5:16 pm  #48


Re: Michael Franzese jail with Mac

This is what the “doctor” did ...

“There were wounds in Kristen’s chest that didn’t have corresponding defects in the clothes,” Murtagh says. He talks in lawyer speak. What he means is: Kristy was probably killed as she slept, by someone who first lifted her pajama top, as if to better identify the location of vital organs. She is knifed front and back, with anatomical precision, along the heart, the aortic arch and the pulmonary vein.”
By Gene Weingarten December 5, 2012

Last edited by Gina (4/13/2022 5:19 pm)

 

4/13/2022 6:33 pm  #49


Re: Michael Franzese jail with Mac

Gina. It’s a tragedy all around.      Who knows what got into the killer mind that night.     Was it JMac, ?   Possible.   Does  it matter after 40 years in jail?    Probably not.    JMac ain’t getting out

Last edited by red1975pacer (4/13/2022 6:34 pm)

     Thread Starter
 

4/13/2022 6:51 pm  #50


Re: Michael Franzese jail with Mac

red1975pacer wrote:

Gina. It’s a tragedy all around.      Who knows what got into the killer mind that night.     Was it JMac, ?   Possible.   Does  it matter after 40 years in jail?    Probably not.    JMac ain’t getting out

 
Was it MacDonald? YES! Absolutely. Does it matter after 40 years in jail? YES! The guilty man, MacDonald, is in the right place, serving the appropriate sentences. Word games don’t change the truth. Got any cold, hard facts or evidence? Every court, up to SCOTUS, has said that MacDonald is guilty and it’s over.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum