Red - not sure what your complaint is.  You expected someone else to post a video just because you mention it?

I told you before, I don't hate JRM, but I do hate what he did.

I find him fascinating actually. I wish we knew more about family annihilators and what triggers them.

I am also intrigued by his ability to fool people into supporting him.  It seems obvious to me what happened in this case, but many otherwise normal people have supported him over the years and believed deeply in his innocence.

Everyone has their own reasons for being on this group. Some like to debate the nuance of the case. Like did Colette go into Kristen's room before Kristen was killed, to try to save her, or after she was already dead?

Other people just want to keep the memory of the victims in our hearts.

Others like to debate the legal issues, like speedy trial, or whether the judge ruled correctly on motions during the trial.

But whatever it is, we should respect the memory of the real victims, and also back up our opinions with logical arguments.

Red,

The Definition of a hero;

“ a person admired for achievements and noble qualities
: one who shows great courage”

What achievements can Mac claim, what noble qualities does he have? Courage? Mac is a coward, always hiding behind lies and manipulation. Colette was and is the true hero. Idolization of Mac, the brutal killer, family annihilator and liar denigrates her courage and sacrifice. Why isn’t Colette one of your heroes?

This board is neither moldy or dying. It’s just the case has wound down and Mac is now quite irrelevant. When something new or important arises, we check it out and discuss it.

Tell me this, if you can, why do you find it so important to support Mac and completely ignore the victims?

red1975pacer wrote:

Why is this called the Jeffry Macdonald case forum?   In my opinion the fascination of the “Event “ is the ups and down and twists and turns of the legal process.  That’s my involvement with the situation.       The victims are not crucial from a “did he do it “ scenario.   It doesn’t mean that the are insignificant in any way

 
The victims ARE crucial and paramount in all aspects of the case. Colette, the wife. The unborn child. Five year old Kimberley and two year old Kristen. All victims, all brutally murdered, dying in pain and anguish and probably in shock that their attacker was their husband/father. And then fifty-two years of lies and manipulation and ridiculous posturing. And fifty-two years of torment for Colette’s, Kimberley’s and Kristen’s family and friends.

By the way; he did it! Proven with volumes of evidence. List the specific evidence that casts doubt on his guilt.

Why can’t you say the names? Why is it so hard?

OneWhoCares wrote:

 

 
I watched part of this video. The moron didn’t even know the girls names and said one was Nichole. What I watched was rife with incorrect information, He claims to have talked to MacDonald in prison, but we only have his word. In my opinion this video is a waste of time.

Last edited by TexasPoet (3/27/2022 1:34 pm)

This video in Franzese opinion is guilty guilty guilty.   Maybe Franzese isn’t exactly Man of the Year, but he most certainly saw the dark side of JMac